关于所谓『射手播放器同样被举报违反开源协议』

1. GPL并不禁止在项目中使用非GPL的组件(详见后文引注)。
2. 射手播放器没有准备移除任何模块。相反,为了做出一个好的表率,减少误解和争议,现在已完完全全提供所有源代码可供公众下载。
3. 射手播放器对于某些人士这种对开源项目的误解和打压技巧表示非常遗憾。

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLAndPlugins
If a program released under the GPL uses plug-ins, what are the requirements for the licenses of a plug-in.
It depends on how the program invokes its plug-ins. If the program uses fork and exec to invoke plug-ins, then the plug-ins are separate programs, so the license for the main program makes no requirements for them.

If the program dynamically links plug-ins, and they make function calls to each other and share data structures, we believe they form a single program, which must be treated as an extension of both the main program and the plug-ins. This means the plug-ins must be released under the GPL or a GPL-compatible free software license, and that the terms of the GPL must be followed when those plug-ins are distributed.

If the program dynamically links plug-ins, but the communication between them is limited to invoking the ‘main’ function of the plug-in with some options and waiting for it to return, that is a borderline case.
And also:
If I add a module to a GPL-covered program, do I have to use the GPL as the license for my module?
The GPL says that the whole combined program has to be released under the GPL. So your module has to be available for use under the GPL.

But you can give additional permission for the use of your code. You can, if you wish, release your program under a license which is more lax than the GPL but compatible with the GPL. The license list page gives a partial list of GPL-compatible licenses.

4. 不过对于开源和是否遵守开源协议能在国内引起这样的讨论我表示欣慰。希望籍此机会,让人们可以更多的了解开源,而使一些公司给开源更多的尊重。
5. 射手播放器会尽其所能坚持开放源代码这条道路。但是,即使射手播放器项目成功被灭杀,对的还是对的,错的还是错的。焦点可以转移,但事实是无法改变的。

Posted Saturday, December 19th, 2009 under Uncategorized.

Tags: ,

206 comments

  1. @yegle

    看了好久,看不过眼了,于理,你是站得住脚,于情,你大错特错,而且别有居心,实在可耻,
    我用射手的原因之一是因为他是开源的,我热爱gpl,也写了几个gpl小程式回馈网路,但是这次事件我支持射手,
    现在虽然射手出了这样一个事件,有错,但我始终相信他是无心之失,老实说中国现在的情况,
    作者就算强奸了gpl,登上了耻辱榜,还是一大堆人在用,会因为登上耻辱榜而不用的屈指可数,
    但是作者还是选择了gpl,证明是有心开源了,而且还一直号召人加入开发,有人要源码没有可能不给,
    只是不想直接放上网暴露给别有居心的人滥用而已,而且过后还是基于你的所谓举报下负责了,
    为什么不能先通知作者?作者的联络方式还不够详细容易发现?
    国外,就算是程式作者发现作品被非法使用也会发一封mail通知,先礼后兵,你这种一来就把事情搞大不是别有居心是什么?
    你先通知作者,结果会是作者先检讨后开源,结局是一样的,不一样的的是你举报,对射手伤害比较大,对你的名气增加更大,
    射手虽然资金来源有部分是透过捐助,字幕是广大网友提供,但几年来的程式开发,平台的建立,维护可是功不可抹,
    但是你几句话“一个服务器多少成本我清楚得很,射手字幕下载的服务器有多少是捐助的而不是自己的也在它的页面上清楚地写着。”
    就想将它抹杀掉,以后还会有多少像射手这样的想做出贡献的会退缩了?一句话,我鄙视你!!

    [Reply]

  2. 诛心之论是思维能力欠缺的表现。
    一个爱较真的学生而已,被tomasen一上来就打成是“tx的狗”
    遗憾啊。

    [Reply]

  3. http://www.verycd.com/topics/2823627/
    此影片用射手影音播放无声音,用KMplayer播放正常,请测试

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

Powered by WP Hashcash